Handbook of service user involvement mental health

The seven steps of concept analysis outlined by Rodgers 17 were followed: Identify the concept of interest and surrogate terms Identify the setting and sample for data collection Collect data to identify the attributes and to identify references, antecedents and consequences Analyse data to identify the attributes and to identify references, antecedents and consequences Conduct interdisciplinary and temporal comparisons.

Identify an exemplar of the concept, if appropriate. Identify implications for further development of the concept. Data analysis The content of each paper was read once initially.

Key attributes of the concept of service user involvement The core aim of concept analysis research is to identify the defining attributes of the concept. Informed decision making The second derived attribute was termed informed decision making. Advocacy The third identified attribute of service user involvement was advocacy. Obtaining service user views and feedback The fourth attribute of service user involvement identified in the concept analysis was termed obtaining service user views and feedback.

Working in partnership The fifth attribute was termed working in partnership. Table 2 Summary of identified consequences of service user involvement. Surrogate terms Rodgers and Knafl 22 define surrogate terms as a means to express the concept other than the term used by the researcher.

This definition of service user involvement in mental health care was proposed as: An active partnership between service users and mental health professionals in decision making regarding the planning, implementation and evaluation of mental health policy, services, education, training and research. Empirical referents of service user involvement Service user involvement was described as having positive consequences by many authors, but few studies empirically tested this assumption.

Looking for an exemplar of the concept Exemplars or cases are illustrations of the concept in action and provide an everyday example of the attributes of the concept.

References 1. Pilgrim D, Waldron L. User involvement in mental health service development: how far can it go? Journal of Mental Health , ; 7 : 95— Chamberlain J. The Journal of Mind and Behaviour , ; : — Geller J. Psychiatric Services , ; 49 : — Kemp P. Creative involvement of service users in the classroom In: Weinstein J. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, — User involvement in community mental health services — principles and practices.

Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing , ; 16 : — User involvement: substance or spin? Journal of Mental Health , ; 12 : — Hird M. Service user involvement in mental health assessment: comparing people's experiences of mental health triage assessments with theoretical perspectives on user involvement. Hopton J, Nolan P. Involving users in mental health services. Mental Health Practice , ; 6 : 15— Criteria for concept evaluation.

Journal of Advanced Nursing , ; 24 : — Morse JM. London: WB Saunders, — Forbes J, Sashidharan SP. User involvement in services — incorporation or challenge? British Journal of Social Work , ; 27 : — Heffernan K. Responding to global shifts in social work through the language of service user and service user involvement. International Journal of Social Welfare , ; 18 : — Information, consultation or control: user involvement in mental health services in England at the turn of the century.

Journal of Mental Health , ; 11 : — Sweeney A, Morgan L. Truman C, Raine P. Experience and meaning of user involvement: some explorations from a community mental health project. Health and Social Care in the Community , ; 10 : — Hickey G, Kipping C. Exploring the concept of user involvement in mental health through a participation continuum.

Journal of Clinical Nursing , ; 7 : 83— Rodgers BI. Concepts, analysis and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. Journal of Advanced Nursing , a; 14 : — Exploring health policy as a concept. Western Journal of Nursing Research , b; 11 : — Rodgers BL. Using concept analysis to enhance clinical practice and research. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing , ; 10 : 28— London: WB Saunders, 77— London: W. Saunders, Identifying the patient perspective of the quality of mental healthcare for common chronic problems: a qualitative study.

Chronic Illness , ; 3 : 46— Greaves H. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 59— Hodge S. User involvement in the construction of a mental health charter: an exercise in communicative rationality? Health Expectations , ; 12 : — Satisfaction with primary care: the perspectives of people with schizophrenia. Family Practice , ; 20 : — Price K, Gillespie S, Rutter D et al Dedicated personality disorder services: a qualitative analysis of service structure and treatment process.

Journal of Mental Health , ; 18 : — Speers J. Service user involvement in the assessment of a practice competency in mental health nursing — Stakeholders views and recommendations. Nurse Education in Practice , ; 8 : — Warne T, Stark S.

Service users and teamworking in mental health. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing , ; 11 : — Weinstein J. Involving mental health service users in quality assurance. Health Expectations , ; 9 : 98— Godfrey M, Wistow G. The user perspective on managing for health outcomes: the case of mental health.

Health and Social Care in the Community , ; 5 : — Does strategic involvement of mental health service users and carers in the planning, design and commissioning of mental health services lead to better outcomes? International Journal of Consumer Studies , ; 34 : — Lea L.

Mental health service users in research considers ways of 'doing research' which bring multiple understandings together effectively, and explains the sociological use of autobiography and its relevance. It examines how our identity shapes the knowledge we produce, and asks why voices which challenge contemporary beliefs about health and the role of treatment are often silenced.

An imbalance of power and opportunity for service users, and the stigmatising nature of services, are considered as human rights issues. Their fields of expertise include LGB issues, racial tensions, and recovering from the shame and stigma of alcoholism. The activity of the professional researcher can also range from being the person undertaking the research, to being a partner with, or mentor to, service users. This broad scope of levels of involvement is reflected in the contributions in this book, both in the research experiences reported and in the writing of the chapters themselves.

Dominant discourse of the last half century has followed a medical perspective. This has marginalised contributions from social science. Furthermore purely medical approaches to mental healthcare have profound shortcomings. Thus, this book draws upon innovative research findings to rejuvenate the relationship between psychiatry and social science. It frames this by reference to certain inevitable and uncertain elements of mental health which characterise this field.

Over nine chapters the volume is a unique contribution to several intersecting areas of intellectual enterprise, research, and learning — as well as a source of insight into how mental health practice and policy might be modified and improved.

As a result, it appeals to a wide range of audiences including social scientists, mental health practitioners, mental health researchers, social theorists, mental health service users, and policy-makers.

Russo, J. Through the eyes of the observed: Re-directing research on psychiatric drugs. Talking Point Papers, 3. Salyers, M. Shared decision-making and self-directed care. Goldman, R. Morrissey Eds. Springer International Publishing. Chapter Google Scholar. Semahegn, A. Psychotropic medication non-adherence and associated factors among adult patients with major psychiatric disorders: A protocol for a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 7 1 , Slade, M. Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.

World Psychiatry, 16 2 , — Stanhope, V. Person-centered care planning and service engagement: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Stein, B. Use of a computerized medication shared decision making tool in community mental health settings: Impact on psychotropic medication adherence. Community Mental Health Journal, 49 2 , — International clinical practice guidelines for early psychosis. British Journal of Psychiatry, suppl. Tobon, A. Racial implicit associations in psychiatric diagnosis, treatment, and compliance expectations.

Academic Psychiatry, 45 , 23— White, E. The role of Facebook groups in the management, and raising of awareness of, antidepressant withdrawal: Is social media filling the void left by health services? Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology. Zisman-Ilani, Y. Expanding the concept of shared decision making for mental health: Systematic search and scoping review of interventions. Mental Health Review Journal, 22 3 , — Shared risk taking: Shared decision making in serious mental illness.

Psychiatric Services, 72 4 , — Shared decision making for psychiatric rehabilitation services before discharge from psychiatric hospitals. Health Communication, 34 6 , — Continue, adjust, or stop antipsychotic medication: Developing and user testing an encounter decision aid for people with first-episode and long-term psychosis.

BMC Psychiatry, 18 1 , Release 25 February Subjects Medical Psychiatry Nonfiction. Search for a digital library with this title Search by city, ZIP code, or library name Learn more about precise location detection. View more libraries Copy and paste the code into your website.